
API & contract governance
Versioning rules, schema compatibility checks, and consumer-driven contract tests for public and internal APIs.
Checklist-led reviews and hands-on engineering for teams splitting monoliths, hardening service boundaries, and shipping reliable APIs in production.
Request an architecture review

Versioning rules, schema compatibility checks, and consumer-driven contract tests for public and internal APIs.

Read paths for resilience patterns: timeouts, bulkheads, idempotency keys, and outbox usage in message-driven flows.

Pair on CI/CD pipelines, container packaging, and progressive delivery that matches your service map.
Before adding another microservice, confirm the data ownership, failure isolation, and operational cost of running it — not just the diagram elegance.
We work with product and platform teams that already ship software but feel release risk rise as modules entangle. The checklist we bring covers domain seams, read/write models, and the operational surface each new service adds.
Typical starting points include strangler-fig extractions, event notification versus event-carried state transfer, and choosing between orchestration and choreography for cross-service workflows.
Engagements are project-based: a written findings memo, prioritized remediation list, and optional follow-on implementation days. We do not resell licenses or run managed hosting; our output is engineering judgment you can audit.
Sessions are conducted in English with documentation your team can keep. On-site workshops are available at our Taichung office or your site by arrangement.

We deliver consulting labor: reviews, design spikes, and co-development on your repositories. Larger build-outs are scoped as time-boxed projects with clear acceptance criteria.
We focus on architecture mechanics — boundaries, messaging, observability, deployment — across common JVM, Node, and .NET service stacks without tying you to a vendor blueprint.
Send a short note via the contact form with your current topology sketch and the pain you are solving. We reply with a proposed review scope.